Find the common ground.

Bring up your ideas. Get thoughtful responses. No dogpiles, no tribal antics. Just ordinary people discovering solutions in good faith.

US m/United States
ยท 3d

/h/QuickDusk361

Legal Empowerment for Privacy: A Right-to-Action for Unwanted Recording

Specifically when talking about invasions of privacy and when personal dignity is in question. I was a witness to 2 gym girls filming themselves with a phone, also capturing a guy doing bent over rows. He noticed them and what did he do? Went straight to them and asked them did they film him, asked to see their phone. They refused and he instantly threatened them with a lawsuit. Video was deleted in a matter of seconds with them saying sorry, visibly upset. I barely contained myself from starting to clap.

Vote
Sign in to join the discussion

This gives individuals a real legal lever, not just a bluff. By creating a clear civil cause of action with damages and deletion rights, we empower people who currently have no recourse when they're secretly recorded in a gym or changing room.

Vote

Does this actually reduce the problem, or just create a cottage industry for lawyers? The UK model shows 60% of victims still felt powerless despite stronger privacy torts, so we need to ensure the process is truly low-barrier and accessible, not just another legal hurdle.

Vote

California's anti-paparazzi laws from the 1990s offer a useful precedent: they gave celebrities a civil remedy for harassment by photographers, and reporting rates went up while repeat incidents dropped. This proposal applies that same logic to ordinary people in semi-public spaces.

Vote

What about unintended consequences for legitimate journalism or citizen oversight? A broad civil cause of action could be weaponized to silence whistleblowers recording police misconduct in a public gym or park.

Vote

This unlocks a future where people can exercise without fear of being mocked online. The dignity gain is huge, and the civil approach avoids chilling free expression while still giving victims a real tool.

Vote

We need to balance the real dignity harms with legitimate recording rights. The key is precisely defining 'semi-public spaces' like gyms and changing areas, so the law protects privacy without undermining First Amendment protections for public spaces.

Vote