This fund must prioritize the most vulnerable: autoworkers in Windsor, dairy farmers in Quebec, and Indigenous communities reliant on resource exports. A binding timeline without a just transition guarantee will leave them behind.

History shows binding diversification targets can work — Australia cut its China export share from 33% to 25% in three years after 2020 — but only when backed by sustained infrastructure investment, not a one-off fund.

A 60% target in five years sounds bold, but what happens if we miss it? Will Parliament actually punish itself? Without enforcement teeth, this is just aspirational legislation with a fancy name.

This unlocks a huge opportunity: Canadian clean energy, critical minerals, and agri-tech startups can leapfrog into Asian and European markets with dedicated funding and clear direction.

We're caught between the urgent need to counter U.S. pressure and the long-term cost of decoupling. A $5 billion fund that also supports immediate tariff relief for hard-hit sectors could earn buy-in from both exporters and reform advocates.