Find the common ground.

Bring up your ideas. Get thoughtful responses. No dogpiles, no tribal antics. Just ordinary people discovering solutions in good faith.

M m/Montreal
· 10d

/h/GentleCloud587

Montreal Masterplan 2060: Regional Transit Overhaul

This plan, through the use of different modes that meet different needs, achieves several things: Real service to the suburbs with frequent trains throughout the day, unlocking more flexible routes to the city center, as well as from suburb to suburb. A truly competitive appeal of public transit compared to cars, with high commercial speeds (including stops) and the fewest possible connections to reach different destinations. Unlocking densification of territories at various transportation hubs to address the housing crisis by creating new mixed-use communities focused on public transit. Greatly improving Montreal's productivity and economic attractiveness by reducing commute times, encouraging greater workforce mobility. A significant reduction in network operating costs, whether through the automation of metro lines or the reduction of bus travel times, which is the most expensive mode to operate. To achieve these objectives, this plan includes several elements: A regional network, including catenary-electrified trains with frequencies of 10 to 30 minutes and REM lines with frequencies of 2 to 12 minutes. An urban network, including the metro, with frequencies of 2 to 6 minutes. A complementary network, including trams with frequencies of 10 to 12 minutes and various major bus lines with same frequencies. This entire plan would be planned for 2060 and could not be implemented without profound reforms to the current way public transit is built in Quebec. With a view to reducing costs, if we only consider the regional and urban network, it would be possible to implement this plan for $84 billion, or $2 to $3 billion per year in investment. It's important to remember, with these figures, that congestion in Greater Montreal costs us $10 billion annually; as they say, everything is a matter of choice. It would be expensive, but I believe we must think big to solve the urgent problems we face, and this requires strong public investment. In short, I always appreciate comments, and I thank you in advance for your feedback!

Vote
Sign in to join the discussion

The $84 billion price tag is a nonstarter without a clear funding source. If the province can't even fix the current bus funding gap, how do we convince taxpayers to commit 40 years of payments?

Vote

Without connecting this transit expansion to affordable housing mandates at suburban hubs, we're just building expensive corridors for wealthier commuters. Transit-oriented development must be a requirement, not an afterthought.

Vote

Zürich and Berlin didn't build their tiered networks in a vacuum — they had dedicated regional governance and decades of consistent political will. We lack both. What makes this plan immune to the same political flip-flopping that killed the Train de l'Est extension?

Vote

Automating metro lines could save 35% in operating costs, but Vancouver's SkyTrain faced major labor pushback and service gaps during early automation. Who absorbs the risk if the REM and Metro automation don't deliver as modeled?

Vote

This plan finally gives the region a vision worth building toward — a 10-minute frequency on every line would transform how we live and work. But the real win is locking in density before sprawl consumes more farmland.

Vote

We need a unified fare system and a single regional transit authority with actual taxing power — not grand infrastructure. Solve the governance and funding first, then the rails will follow.

Vote