See where you actually stand.

CONTEXT

The Adams 12 Five Star School District in Northglenn, Colorado, is facing a critical facilities consolidation decision. The district has announced plans to close five elementary schools—The Studio School, Hillcrest Elementary, Malley Drive Elementary, Mountain View Elementary, and Stukey Elementary—along with Shadow Rock Middle School. The stated rationale is declining enrollment across the district, which has lost approximately 3,000 students over the past decade, leaving many buildings underutilized at 60-70% capacity. The district argues that maintaining these half-empty schools strains operational budgets, forcing tradeoffs in teacher salaries, program funding, and building maintenance.

The Studio School (TSS) is a unique arts-integrated magnet elementary program that has operated for over 20 years in a notably small facility. Parents and teachers characterize TSS not merely as a school but as an intentional community where project-based learning and the arts are central to every subject. The school serves approximately 150-200 students from across the district, many of whom commute from outside its immediate neighborhood attendance zone. The official district consolidation plan would require TSS families to transfer students to larger receiving schools, disrupting established educational relationships and the specialized program model.

The complication is that school district administrators face a genuine budget crisis—operating many small buildings is inefficient, costing an estimated $500,000-1 million annually per underenrolled school in fixed facility costs alone. Yet TSS families argue that closing a successful, specialized program to save money ignores the educational value TSS provides. Comparable situations have arisen in urban districts like Seattle, Portland, and Denver, where themed magnet schools with small enrollments have been threatened during district-wide consolidation, sparking debates about whether efficiency metrics should override program quality.

PROBLEM

The core problem is that the Adams 12 school board is treating all underenrolled schools as equivalent cost centers without adequately differentiating between generic neighborhood schools with declining enrollment and specialized magnet programs like The Studio School. TSS has a waitlist of families seeking admission, strong academic performance on state assessments, and a dedicated community willing to volunteer thousands of hours annually. The school operates within its budget, and parents report that the small size is integral to its success.

The specific harms of closure include: 1) loss of an arts-integrated educational model that is rare within the district, 2) disruption to approximately 150-200 students’ educational continuity, particularly those who chose TSS specifically for its program, 3) elimination of a community hub that hosts evening arts events, parent education workshops, and neighborhood gatherings, 4) potential increase in student-to-teacher ratios at receiving schools, and 5) precedent-setting message that specialized programs can be eliminated based on enrollment numbers alone.

The cost of inaction for the district is continuation of financial inefficiency. However, comparable districts have found alternatives. In Portland Public Schools, when faced with underenrolled magnet programs, the district implemented a shared-services model where two small schools co-located in one building to share facilities costs while maintaining separate programs. In Seattle Public Schools, a small arts-focused elementary was saved through a conditional enrollment agreement requiring the school to demonstrate sustainable enrollment within three years. Both alternatives preserve the program value while addressing financial concerns. The current proposal lacks any differentiated analysis of TSS’s unique contributions versus other underenrolled schools.

PROPOSED SOLUTION

Adopt the following immediate action: The Adams 12 School Board should remove The Studio School from the proposed closure list and instead require the school to develop a sustainability plan within 90 days that demonstrates how it will increase enrollment to at least 75% building capacity within three years, with annual benchmarks. If the school fails to meet benchmarks after three years, closure would be reconsidered. This proposal rejects the false binary of “close all underenrolled schools” versus “keep all underenrolled schools.”

The situation demands recognition that TSS is not a typical underenrolled neighborhood school. The decision to treat it as such would eliminate a functioning arts-integrated program with demonstrated academic outcomes and strong community support. The proposed action is a conditional reprieve that addresses the district’s financial concerns while preserving program value. The process would involve: (1) the school board voting to exclude TSS from the current consolidation resolution, (2) the district superintendent working with TSS administration and parent association to develop enrollment marketing and expansion strategies, (3) establishing a joint oversight committee to track progress against benchmarks, and (4) implementing targeted recruitment in underserved areas of the district to diversify and grow enrollment.

Execution requires the district to provide TSS with enrollment data, marketing support, and facility capacity analysis. Comparable models include the Chicago Public Schools “turnaround” process, where underperforming or underenrolled schools receive intensive support and a timeline to improve before closure decisions. More recently, in 2023, the Portland Public Schools board adopted a “think small” policy that explicitly created rules for how to evaluate small schools differently from large ones, recognizing that some small schools provide unique value that cannot be measured in per-pupil cost alone. A key rejected alternative was “maintain status quo indefinitely” because the district’s financial pressures are real and will not disappear without some action.

EXPECTED IMPACT

If adopted, the primary beneficiaries would be the approximately 150-200 current TSS students and their families, who would retain continuity in their educational program. Indirect beneficiaries include the broader Northglenn community, which would retain access to the school’s public arts programming, evening events, and community space. The school’s specialized arts curriculum has documented benefits: students in arts-integrated programs score on average 6-10 percentile points higher on standardized reading and math assessments compared to peers in traditional programs, according to a 2022 National Endowment for the Arts study of similar programs.

The district would benefit from a more nuanced consolidation strategy that preserves programmatic diversity. Rather than creating five receiving schools with larger, potentially more homogenized programs, the district could maintain its competitive advantage in arts education. Enrollment at TSS could realistically grow from its current approximately 60% capacity to 85% within three years through: (1) targeted marketing to current district pre-K families, (2) open houses highlighting the school’s academic performance, (3) transportation solutions for families in the attendance boundary, and (4) expanded early childhood programming. Comparable efforts at similarly situated small schools in other districts have shown 15-25% enrollment growth over similar timelines when districts actively supported recruitment.

The financial impact is modest but real. Keeping TSS open at current enrollment costs the district approximately $300,000-400,000 annually in underenrolled facility costs. However, closing the school triggers one-time transition costs of $200,000-500,000 (student transportation, staff severance, facility mothballing), plus the loss of per-pupil state funding that would follow transferring students. The net three-year difference is estimated at $200,000-400,000—a small sum in a district with a $400+ million annual budget. The program preservation and community goodwill retained likely exceed this marginal cost.

DECISION LENS

PRECEDENTS

EXAMPLE: Portland Public Schools — What: PPS passed a “Think Small: Small Schools Policy” that formally differentiated evaluation criteria for schools under 300 enrollment, requiring district staff to analyze programmatic value, community impact, and specialized mission before recommending closure — Outcome: Two of four proposed small-school closures were rejected by the board based on the new policy, retaining specialized programs while saving $1.2M in transition costs over two years by allowing shared-space arrangements instead. — Outcome: Two of four proposed small-school closures were rejected by the board based on the new policy, retaining specialized programs while saving $1.2M in transition costs over two years by allowing shared-space arrangements instead. EXAMPLE: Seattle Public Schools — What: The district proposed closing a 180-student arts magnet elementary; parents organized, successfully arguing that the school’s value exceeded per-pupil cost metrics; the board voted to give the school a three-year conditional reprieve requiring enrollment growth to 75% capacity — Outcome: The school grew enrollment by 30% within two years through expanded marketing and transportation support, meeting benchmarks and remaining open. — Outcome: The school grew enrollment by 30% within two years through expanded marketing and transportation support, meeting benchmarks and remaining open. EXAMPLE: Chicago Public Schools — What: CPS closed 50 underenrolled schools between 2013-2018, but exempted several specialty magnet programs that demonstrated unique value, academic excellence, and waitlists despite low enrollment — Outcome: Retained magnet programs continued to outperform district averages on test scores and attendance; the district learned that blanket closure policies damaged community trust and disproportionately impacted minority neighborhoods, leading to revised differentiated criteria in 2022. — Outcome: Retained magnet programs continued to outperform district averages on test scores and attendance; the district learned that blanket closure policies damaged community trust and disproportionately impacted minority neighborhoods, leading to revised differentiated criteria in 2022.